rud.is

I saw the story about body camera footage from a officers involved police stop & fatal shooting in Salt Lake City.
The indiviual killed was a felon — convicted of aggravated assuault — with an outstanding warrant.

He tried to run. At some point in the brief chase he pivoted and appeared to be reaching for a weapon — likely a knife, which was confirmed after the fact.

One officer pulled a tazer. Another pulled a gun. Officer Fox — the one who fired the gun — said he was terrified by how close Mr. Harmon was to the officers when Mr. Harmon stopped and turned toward them.

I wasn’t there. I don’t risk getting injured or killed in the line of duty every day. I don’t face down armed suspects in fast-moving, tense situations.

But, I’m weary of this being a cut+paste story that is a nigh weekly event in America.

Officers are killed by suspects as well. It’s equally tragic.

Below is just “data”. Just a visual documentary of where we are 17-ish years into the 21st Century in America.

And, most of America seems to be OK with this. Then again, most of America is OK with the “price of freedom” being one mass shooting a day.

I’m not.

I scaled the Y axis the same in both faceted charts to make it easier to glance across both sets of tragedies.

This was generated on Sunday, October 8, 2017. If you run the code after that date, remove the saved data files and tweak the Y-scale limits since the death toll will rise.

library(httr)
library(rvest)
library(stringi)
library(hrbrthemes)
library(tidyverse)

read.table(sep=":", stringsAsFactors=FALSE, header=TRUE, 
           text="race:description
W:White, non-Hispanic
B:Black, non-Hispanic
H:Hispanic
N:Native American
A:Asian
None:Other/Unknown
O:Other") -> rdf

wapo_data_url <- "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/washingtonpost/data-police-shootings/master/fatal-police-shootings-data.csv"
shootings_file <- basename(wapo_data_url)
if (!file.exists(shootings_file)) download.file(wapo_data_url, shootings_file)

cols(
  id = col_integer(),
  name = col_character(),
  date = col_date(format = ""),
  manner_of_death = col_character(),
  armed = col_character(),
  age = col_integer(),
  gender = col_character(),
  race = col_character(),
  city = col_character(),
  state = col_character(),
  signs_of_mental_illness = col_character(),
  threat_level = col_character(),
  flee = col_character(),
  body_camera = col_character()
) -> shootings_cols

read_csv(shootings_file, col_types = shootings_cols) %>% 
  mutate(yr = lubridate::year(date), wk = lubridate::week(date)) %>% 
  filter(yr >= 2017) %>% 
  mutate(race = ifelse(is.na(race), "None", race)) %>% 
  mutate(race = ifelse(race=="O", "None", race)) %>% 
  count(race, wk) %>% 
  left_join(rdf, by="race") %>% 
  mutate(description = factor(description, levels=rdf$description)) -> xdf

lod_url <- "https://www.odmp.org/search/year/2017?ref=sidebar"
lod_rds <- "officer_lod.rds"
if (!file.exists(lod_rds)) {
  res <- httr::GET(lod_url)
  write_rds(res, lod_rds)
} else {
  res <- read_rds(lod_rds)
}
pg <- httr::content(res, as="parsed", encoding = "UTF-8")

html_nodes(pg, xpath=".//table[contains(., 'Detective Chad William Parque')]") %>% 
  html_nodes(xpath=".//td[contains(., 'EOW')]") %>% 
  html_text() %>% 
  stri_extract_all_regex("(EOW:[[:space:]]+(.*)\n|Cause of Death:[[:space:]]+(.*)\n)", simplify = TRUE) %>% 
  as_data_frame() %>% 
  mutate_all(~{
    stri_replace_first_regex(.x, "^[[:alpha:][:space:]]+: ", "") %>% 
      stri_trim_both() 
    }
  ) %>% 
  as_data_frame() %>%  
  set_names(c("day", "cause")) %>% 
  mutate(day = as.Date(day, "%A, %B %e, %Y"), wk = lubridate::week(day))%>% 
  count(wk, cause) -> odf 

ggplot(xdf, aes(wk, n)) +
  geom_segment(aes(xend=wk, yend=0)) +
  scale_y_comma(limits=c(0,15)) +
  facet_wrap(~description, scales="free_x") +
  labs(x="2017 Week #", y="# Deaths",
       title="Weekly Fatal Police Shootings in 2017",
       subtitle=sprintf("2017 total: %s", scales::comma(sum(xdf$n))),
       caption="Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2017/") +
  theme_ipsum_rc(grid="Y")

count(odf, cause, wt=n, sort=TRUE) -> ordr

mutate(odf, cause = factor(cause, levels=ordr$cause)) %>% 
  ggplot(aes(wk, n)) +
  geom_segment(aes(xend=wk, yend=0)) +
  scale_x_continuous(limits=c(0, 40)) +
  scale_y_comma(limits=c(0,15)) +
  facet_wrap(~cause, ncol=3, scales="free_x") +
  labs(x="2017 Week #", y="# Deaths",
       title="Weekly Officer Line of Duty Deaths in 2017",
       subtitle=sprintf("2017 total: %s", scales::comma(sum(odf$n))),
       caption="Source: https://www.odmp.org/search/year/2017") +
  theme_ipsum_rc(grid="Y")

I need to be up-front about something: I’m somewhat partially at fault for ? being elected. While I did not vote for him, I could not in any good conscience vote for his Democratic rival. I wrote in a ticket that had one Democrat and one Republican on it. The “who” doesn’t matter and my district in Maine went abundantly for ?’s opponent, so there was no real impact of my direct choice but I did actively point out the massive flaws in his opponent. Said flaws were many and I believe we’d be in a different bad place, but not equally as bad of a place now with her. But, that’s in the past and we’ve got a new reality to deal with, now.

This is a (hopefully) brief post about finding a way out of this mess we’re in. It’s far from comprehensive, but there’s honest-to-goodness evil afoot that needs to be met head on.

Brand Damage

You’ll note I’m not using either of their names. Branding is extremely important to both of them, but is the almost singular focus of ?. His name is his hotel brand, company brand and global identifier. Using it continues to add it to the history books and can only help inflate the power of that brand. First and foremost, do not use his name in public posts, articles, papers, etc. “POTUS”, “The President”, “The Commander in Chief”, “?” (chosen to match his skin/hair color, complexion and that comb-over tuft) are all sufficient references since there is date-context with virtually anything we post these days. Don’t help build up his brand. Don’t populate historical repositories with his name. Don’t give him what he wants most of all: attention.

Document and Defend with Data

Speaking of the historical record, we need to be blogging and publishing regularly the actual facts based on data. We also need to save data as there’s signs of a deliberate government purge going on. I’m not sure how successful said purge will be in the long run and I suspect that the long-term effects of data purging and corruption by this administration will have lasting unintended consequences.

Join/support @datarefuge to save data & preserve the historical record.

Install the Wayback Machine plugin and take the 2 seconds per site you visit to click it.

Create blog posts, tweets, news articles and papers that counter bad facts with good/accurate/honest ones. Don’t make stuff up (even a little). Validate your posits before publishing. Write said posts in a respectful tone.

Support the Media

When the POTUS’ Chief Strategist says things like “The media should be embarrassed and humiliated and keep its mouth shut and just listen for a while” it’s a deliberate attempt to curtail the Press and eventually there will be more actions to actually suppress Press freedom.

I’m not a liberal (I probably have no convenient definition) and I think the Press gave Obama a free ride during his eight year rule. They are definitely making up for that now, mostly because their very livelihoods are at stake.

The problem with them is that they are continuing to let themselves be manipulated by ?. He’s a master at this manipulation. Creating a story about the size of his hands in a picture delegitimizes you as a purveyor of news, especially when — as you’re watching his hands — he’s separating families, normalizing bigotry and undermining the Constitution. Forget about the hands and even forget about the hotels (for now). There was even a recent story trying to compare email servers (the comparison is very flawed). Stop it.

Encourage reporters to focus on things that actually matter and provide pointers to verifiable data they can use to call out the lack of veracity in ?’s policies. Personal blog posts are fleeting things but an NYT, WSJ (etc) story will live on.

Be Kind

I’ve heard and read some terrible language about rural America from what I can only classify as “liberals” in the week this post was written. Intellectual hubris and actual, visceral disdain for those who don’t think a certain way were two major reasons why ? got elected. The actual reasons he got elected are diverse and very nuanced.

Regardless of political leaning, pick your head up from your glowing rectangles and go out of your way to regularly talk to someone who doesn’t look, dress, think, eat, etc like you. Engage everyone with compassion. Regularly challenge your own beliefs.

There is a wedge that I estimate is about 1/8th of the way into the core of America now. Perpetuating this ideological “us vs them” mindset is only going to fuel the fires that created the conditions we’re in now and drive the wedge in further. The only way out is through compassion.

Remember: all life matters. Your degree, profession, bank balance or faith alignment doesn’t give you the right to believe you are better than anyone else.

FIN (for now)

I’ll probably move most of future opines to a new medium (not uppercase Medium) as you may be getting this drivel when you want recipes or R code (even though there are separate feeds for them).

It is surprisingly shorter (or longer if you grok regular expressions) than you think it might be: http[s]://.*.

Like it or not, bias is everywhere and tis woefully insidious. “Mainstream media” [MSM]; Alt-left; Alt-right; and, everything in-between creates and promotes “fake” news. Hourly. It always has. Due to the speed at which [dis]information travels now, this is the ultimate era of whatever _you_ believe is “true” is actually “true”, regardless of the morality or (unadulterated, non-theoretical) scientific facts. Sadly, it always has been this way and it always will be this way. Failing to recognize Truth tis the nature of an inherently flawed, broken species.

The reason the MSM is having trouble defining and coming to the grips with “fake news” is that it — itself — has been a witting and unwitting co-conspirator to it since before the invention of the printing press. Tis hard to see the big picture when one navel-gazes so much.

Nobody wants to be wrong and — right now — the only ones who _are_ wrong are those who disagree with _you_. Fundamentally, everyone wants their own aberrations to be normalized and we’re obliging that _in spades_ in our 21st century society. Go. Team.

Rather than sit back and accept said aberrations as the norm, verify **everything** that is presented as “fact”. That may mean opening an honest-to-goodness book or three. Sadly, given the sorry state of public & university libraries, you may need to go to multiple ones to finally get at an actual, real, fact. It may also mean coming to grips with that what you want *so desperately to be “OK”* is actually not OK. Just realize you have permission to be wrong.

Naively believe *nothing* (including this rant blog post). Challenge everything. Seek to recognize, acknowledge and promote Truth wherever it shines. Finally, don’t mistake your own desires for said Truth.

>_The parent proposed a committee made up of parents and teachers of different cultural backgrounds come up with a list of books that are inclusive for all students._

Where’s the [ACLU](https://www.aclu.org/issues/free-speech/artistic-expression/banned-books)? They’d be right there if this was an alt-right’er asking to ban books with salacious content they deem (rightly or wrongly) “inappropriate” or “harmful” to teens. I hope they step up and fight the fight the good fight here.

We’re rapidly losing — or may have already lost (as a society) — the concept of building resilience & strength through adversity. I’m hopeful that the diversity we bring into this country with immigrants and refugees (if the borders don’t close shut or we scare them away) that know what true adversity is will eventually counteract this downward spiral.

Refs:

–
–
– (mp3 backup in the event they take down the audio record)

When something pops up in the news, on Twitter, Facebook or even (ugh) Gab claiming or teasing findings based on data I believe it’s more important than ever to reply with some polite text and a `#showmethedata` hashtag. We desperately needed it this year and we’re absolutely going to need it in 2017 and beyond.

The catalyst for this is a recent [New Yorker story](http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/11/activists-urge-hillary-clinton-to-challenge-election-results.html) about “computer scientists” playing off of heated election emotions and making claims in a non-public, partisan meeting with no release of data to the public or to independent, non-partisan groups with credible, ethical data analysis teams.

I believe agents of parties in power and agents of the parties who want to be in power are going to be misusing, abusing and fabricating data at a velocity and volume we’ve not seen before. If you care about the truth (the real truth, not a “necessary truth” based on an agenda) and are a capable data-worker it’s nigh your civic duty to keep in check those that are want to deceive.

**UPDATE** 2016-11-23 10:30:00 EST

Haderman has an (ugh) [Medium post](https://medium.com/@jhalderm/want-to-know-if-the-election-was-hacked-look-at-the-ballots-c61a6113b0ba#.vvcd9bguw) (ugh for using Medium vs the post content) and, as usual, the media causes more controversy than necessary. He has the best intentions and future confidentiality, integrity and availability of our electoral infrastructure at heart.